Monday, February 15, 2016

70 Acres In Chicago: Cabrini Green


Matt Wade <actionmatt@gmail.com>: Feb 15 02:12PM -0800 

Twenty years in the making, "70 Acres In Chicago" tells the volatile story
of this hotly contested patch of real estate, while looking unflinchingly
at race, class, and survival.
View this email in your browser
<http://us10.campaign-archive2.com/?u=2875168c9bddeece33347343e&id=ecf21c4da1&e=591ce7972e>


For 70 years, there stood a Chicago public housing community known as
Cabrini Green.

Home to thousands, misunderstood by millions, Cabrini Green once towered
over Chicago’s most valuable neighborhoods. A looming reminder of
inequality and poverty, Cabrini’s high-rises were demolished and an
African-American community cleared to make room for another social
experiment: mixed-income neighborhoods.

Shot over the course of 20-years, *70 Acres in Chicago* documents this
upheaval, from the razing of the first buildings in 1995, to the clashes in
the mixed-income neighborhoods a decade later.

*70 Acres in Chicago* tells the volatile story of this hotly contested
patch of land, while looking unflinchingly at race, class, and who has the
right to live in the city.

Please join us for the first Bay Area screening of this important and
timely new documentary.



Thursday, February 25th,The Incite/Insight Film Series Presents
*"70 Acres In Chicago: Cabrini Green"*
by Ronit Bezalel

*The New Nothing Cinema*
16 Sherman Street
Near 7th and Folsom, San Francisco
Between Folsom & Harrison and 6th & 7th
Nearest BART is Civic Center
8 p.m.
Free Admission


The Incite/Insight Film Series is a project of The New Nothing Cinema and
The Department of Anthropology and Social Change at CIIS.

Please join us for an evening of film and discussion, and bring beverages
to share if you can.




[More about the film:]



By Odie Henderson
From RogerEbert.com
November 13, 2015


Being poor in this country is considered a crime, and it always has been.
The perceived sin of poverty is supposedly committed by those who are just
too shiftless and lazy to “pull themselves up by their bootstraps” and
succeed. Never mind that those bootstraps may have been Krazy-Glued to the
concrete by institutionalized racism, class warfare and the redlining of
neighborhoods; in the jaundiced eye of politicians and the wealthy, we all
start from equal footing and the reason we’re not all rich is because we’re
just not as motivated. So it’s important that one of the many things
filmmaker Ronit Bezalel
<http://cafedmz.us10.list-manage.com/track/click?u=2875168c9bddeece33347343e&id=4dcb4a0d1d&e=591ce7972e>
points out in her insightful documentary “70 Acres in Chicago: Cabrini
Green” is that, despite one’s attempts at success, there were forces that
strove to tamp down one’s ascendance. Nowhere is this more prevalent than
in one’s living arrangements: where a person resides is determined by
numerous corruptible factors beyond their control.

The restriction of where a certain type of people could live is what begat
Cabrini Green. The famous Chicago housing project was built as a separate
area to house the influx of African-Americans migrating from the South.
Since space was limited, the city built upward, creating the familiar
high-rise structure that many inner-city projects took. Cabrini Green
became its own separate entity from the city of Chicago, with its own
police force and a sense of community that arose as much out of necessity
as it did out of logistics. The narrator describes Cabrini Green as “*just
one mile from Downtown [Chicago], yet in a whole ‘nother economic dimension*.”
Its 70 acres, bordered by North Avenue, Halsted Street, Chicago Avenue and
Orleans Street, were a piece of real estate worth salivating over, provided
it could be reshaped.

“70 Acres” points out that Cabrini Green rose from the ashes of a prior,
similarly impoverished neighborhood called “Little Sicily,” a place filled
with Italians, Jews and Blacks, none of whom could legally live anywhere
else. The city of Chicago uprooted the denizens of Little Sicily in the
same way it would uproot Cabrini Green’s inhabitants 60 years later. In
both instances, the newer housing came with a different, more stringent set
of rules that prohibited many from returning to their old neighborhood. The
only difference here is that, while many of the Italian and Jewish people
were able to move into the White neighborhoods, their former Black
neighbors still could not. Those people went to Cabrini Green, which, as
the documentary opens, is being converted to the “mixed income” housing
that many displaced residents won’t be able to move into either.

“70 Acres in Chicago: Cabrini Green” continues Bezalel’s 20-year look at
Cabrini Green, and one of the film’s strengths is its casual depiction of
the passage of time. For example, we meet a teenager named Raymond McDonald
who is a little older and wiser every time we check in with him. Raymond’s
story is the film in microcosm. He’s present at every step of Cabrini
Green’s conversion. At the beginning, we see him and his fellow high school
classmates asking Chicago’s Mayor Daley how he would feel about being
removed from his own neighborhood. We then see him in a botched interaction
with some new White residents of the first section of mixed-income housing
(“*They don’t want me here*,” he says to the camera). Later, we see that
his successful dog-training business has become a casualty of the
increasingly strict rules of the new houses, rules that affect the
lower-income residents far more than their new neighbors. We also follow
Mark Pratt and Deirdre Brewster, older residents who as activists speak out
about the changes as they occur.

Though the film runs a (too-short) 60 minutes, it speaks volumes about
gentrification and the concept of “mixed-income” housing, the latter of
which feels like a social experiment slowly going awry. “*In theory*,” says
Mark Joseph, an associate professor of Community Practice, “*the most basic
thing this is supposed to do is reconnect those living in public housing to
the rest of the community.*” The results are middling at best. One new
neighbor throws block parties that are barely attended by a mix of
different income residents, and those who do tend to stay in their own
groups. Also, as the film progresses, we notice that those former Cabrini
residents lucky enough to transition over have become fearful of the
conditions stacked against their favor. Any bad behavior, real or imagined,
complained about by the neighbors will result in eviction.

“*To live here, you need to be a nun*,” one resident says regarding the
numerous new rules regarding safety. One of these rules states that if you
have any kind of criminal record (even a misdemeanor), you are not allowed
to live in the new houses. One woman describes how her 18-year-old
daughter, who had been arrested for fighting in school years prior, could
not live with the rest of the family. “*If you have a record of any kind*,”
another resident says, “*and in Cabrini Green it’s very likely somebody in
your family does, you won’t be living in the new Cabrini Green*.”

Bezalel does a very good job editing many years of footage together,
telling her story through the interactions of politicians, residents and
the educators who provide historical context. She stands back, offering no
solutions while letting the viewer draw his or her own emotional
conclusions. Joy, sorrow and anger exist above and below the surface, but
“70 Acres” never forces one’s response. I am sure that my own experiences
seeing my hometown undergo a similar transformation teased out a higher
level of anger in me than some viewers may feel.

Cabrini Green’s demolition began in 1995 and ended in 2011 with the last
tower being demolished. “70 Acres” presents a New Orleans-style funeral for
that last building, with a drumline of musicians playing, and former
residents coming back from all over the U.S. to attend the send-off. One
former resident, who has moved out to the suburbs, tells us that, despite
the safer environment he currently inhabits, he is not as comfortable as he
was in Cabrini Green. “*There was violence*,” he says of the projects, “*but
there was also a sense of community that surrounded you*.” This notion of
“dealing with the Devil we know” is what a lot of pro-gentrification
advocates completely miss. This film connects the current “for your own
good” characteristics of today’s gentrification with its prior, more
overtly racially motivated and classist incarnations. The elevation of one
poor neighborhood forces the ouster of its residents and the creation of
another. The cycle continues, and the circle remains unbroken.

No comments:

Post a Comment