Noise. A
pejorative term for sound a human perceives to be disorganized, unimportant, or
useless. Larkin uses the term noise to denote the aesthetic of pirated media as
well as the "corruption" of media infrastructure, or its use for
purposes beyond the original intent of the engineers. Larkin develops these
concepts of noise in creative ways, citing the chapter "Asia in Miniature:
Signification, Noise, and Cosmopolitan Style" from James Ferguson's Expectations
of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt as a source for his ideas.
In Ferguson's chapter, noise does
not signify sound itself, but sound as a metaphor for the clouding of cultural
texts. Semiotic interpretation of cultures, he writes, takes for granted
consistent systems of shared meaning. But "cities are noisy" (Ferguson 209),
with many languages, cultures, and "social microworlds," creating
discordance and miscommunication. Ferguson suggests that noise, unintelligibility, and misunderstanding are crucial components of societies, with their own social
logic. Ferguson argues "for an analytic of noise, for a mode of analysis
that would take seriously both the fact that signifying actors might have
social reasons not to establish a bond of communication but to rupture it, and
the way that stylistic messages take on a social significance—whether they are
'understood' or not—through a social process of construal of the partially
unintelligible" (Ferguson 210). Defined in this way, the analytic of noise can easily be applied to infrastructure when, as Larkin describes, its originally intended use and meaning are ruptured.
Larkin returns noise to its more
literal meaning before crafting his own extended theory. At first he discusses
noise as distortion of copied pirated material:
Piracy imposes particular
conditions on recording, transmitting, and retrieving data. Constant copying
erodes data storage, degrading image and sound, overwhelming the signal of
media content with the noise produced by the means of reproduction. Pirate
videos are marked by blurred images and distorted sound, creating a material
screen that filters audiences’ engagement with media technologies and the new
senses of time, speed, space, and contemporaneity. In this way, piracy creates
an aesthetic, a set of formal qualities that generate a particular sensorial
experience of media marked by poor transmission, interference, and noise (Larkin
218-219).
Later in the chapter Larkin describes musicians deliberately
destroying loudspeakers to achieve the distorted sound they find aesthetically
pleasing (Larkin 237). The distortion, fuzziness, and interference make these
media sources seem more real, more material, he argues.
But Larkin extends his argument further into a theory of noise as disruption of infrastructure. Piracy itself, as a restructuring of technological infrastructure, can be considered noise. In piracy infrastructure is re-appropriated for unforeseen and unintended use. "All regimes of capital depend on infrastructure" (Larkin 219), he writes, yet "much work on the transformative effects of media takes for granted a media system that is smoothly efficient rather than acknowledging the reality of infrastructural connections that are frequently messy, discontinuous, and poor" (Larkin 220). Piracy, for Larkin, involves a "corruption" of media infrastructure, fuzziness and noise disrupting the original intent of the engineers. This corruption uncouples Nigeria from the official worldwide economy and integrates it into an unofficial world economy. I find the idea of noise as lost connection intriguing, but the creative use of media infrastructure is not a Ferguson-esque lack of understanding, but a highly developed and organized alternative infrastructure. If a system of infrastructure does not feed into official modes of movement of capital, and yet manages to function in a highly organized and efficient manner, is it still noise?
But Larkin extends his argument further into a theory of noise as disruption of infrastructure. Piracy itself, as a restructuring of technological infrastructure, can be considered noise. In piracy infrastructure is re-appropriated for unforeseen and unintended use. "All regimes of capital depend on infrastructure" (Larkin 219), he writes, yet "much work on the transformative effects of media takes for granted a media system that is smoothly efficient rather than acknowledging the reality of infrastructural connections that are frequently messy, discontinuous, and poor" (Larkin 220). Piracy, for Larkin, involves a "corruption" of media infrastructure, fuzziness and noise disrupting the original intent of the engineers. This corruption uncouples Nigeria from the official worldwide economy and integrates it into an unofficial world economy. I find the idea of noise as lost connection intriguing, but the creative use of media infrastructure is not a Ferguson-esque lack of understanding, but a highly developed and organized alternative infrastructure. If a system of infrastructure does not feed into official modes of movement of capital, and yet manages to function in a highly organized and efficient manner, is it still noise?
Click here to access the Ferguson chapter
Ferguson, James. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, c1999 1999.
No comments:
Post a Comment